News - ‘Benefits barrier’ to UK pensions
May 26, 2008 on 10:15 pm | In National Insurance | No Comments
Mr Turner said people on low incomes feared that saving would bar them from receiving benefits such as the Pension Credit.
Complexity and high charges were also putting as many as 12 million people off saving for , he said.
In October, the Commission warned that the UK faced a pension black hole.
At the time, Mr Turner said a mix of higher taxes, more saving and a higher average retirement age was needed to solve the UK’s pension crisis.
Benefit impact
Mr Turner was appearing in front of the Work and Pensions Committee along with fellow commissioners Jeannie Drake and John Hills.
MPs pressed the commissioners on the possible negative impact of means testing on the UK’s savings culture.
Mr Turner said that if means testing continued to be extended, large swathes of the UK population would be claiming some form of benefit or tax credit.
He was not criticising means testing in principle, he said. But it was proving a “barrier” to saving.
“Certainty there are some people whose rational incentive to save is impacted by means testing,” Mr Turner told MPs.
Mr Turner added that financial advisers were put off advising clients on low incomes to start a pension for fear of facing future accusations of mis-selling.
Financial advisers feared that the expansion of means testing could mean that clients would have their savings cancelled out by cuts in benefit.
Poorer pensioners
The Pensions Commission was asked in 2002 to look into the state of UK retirement provision.
In October, it produced a report outlining the scale of the UK’s pension crisis.
The UK’s ageing population means that, in future years, taxpayers will have to support an increasing number of over-65s through the state pension.
The interim report said that society and individuals must choose a mix of four options including:
The Pensions Commission will produce a final report next autumn, which will outline in greater detail its recommendations for overcoming the UK’s pension crisis.
When asked by MPs if he would bring forward the publication of his report Mr Turner said it was “More important to get out recommendations right rather than early”.
Means tested benefits are putting people off saving, the Pension er Adair Turner has told a committee of MPs.
![]()
![]()
Certainty there are some people whose rational incentive to save is impacted by means testing
News - Women facing retirement poverty
May 25, 2008 on 4:59 am | In National Insurance | No CommentsWomen are being “short changed” over pensions, according to the TUC.
The union body said a combination of low pay and part-time work meant many women were unable to build up a sufficient company pension.
In addition, many women miss out on a full state pension due to time spent away from work to look after children.
Firms should have to to their workers’ pensions and state pension contribution rules be relaxed to help women, the TUC said.
Precarious
|
Our pensions system was not designed with women in mind
Brendan Barber, TUC
|
More women than ever are in the workforce but almost half of them are in part-time employment.
Many part-time jobs do not bring access to a company pension scheme.
The TUC that only 15% of unskilled women in part-time jobs are members of a company pension scheme.
“Our pensions system was not designed with women in mind,” said TUC general secretary Brendan Barber.
“It is out of date and condemns many millions of women to an uncertain and precarious retirement.”
Mr Barber urged the government to help plug the gap in female pension provision.
Employers should be made to contribute to their employees’ pensions and rules stopping women with less than 10 years National Insurance contributions from collecting state pension should be abolished, Mr Barber said.
News - Call to overhaul UK state pension
May 24, 2008 on 12:45 am | In National Insurance | No Comments| The UK pension system has been branded inadequate and too complex by a leading retirement think-tank.
The PPI added that once the state system was reformed the should look at options to overhaul private and workplace pensions.
|
News - Pensions Panic: Any Way Out?
May 22, 2008 on 4:37 pm | In National Insurance | No CommentsIn the first of a two-part Money Programme special, reporter Michael Robinson reveals what’s gone wrong with Britain’s once world-renowned pension system.
Trevor Matthews, chief executive of pensions at Standard Life, is one of those concerned about what the future holds.
“The prospect is that this generation is not going to enjoy the dignity in retirement that they deserve, they are not going to enjoy a good quality of life in retirement, they’re going to be worrying about every pound they spend,” he said.
At 79.60 a week, Britain’s state pension is one of the lowest in the developed world. For many people, it is just too low to live on, especially if you don’t even get the full amount.
Rosemarie Brierley, who is 67, gets just 50.22 a week from the state, so despite reaching retirement age, she has to keep on working to make ends meet.
She doesn’t qualify for the full basic state pension of 79.60 because she took time out of the workplace to bring up a family.
To qualify for the full amount, women need to pay National Insurance for 39 years, men for 44 years.
Half of British women don’t qualify for the full basic state pension and Rosemarie thinks this is wrong.
“I worked as hard as any man in this country but differently, I think it’s a scandal, it’s worse than a scandal it’s ,” she said.
‘Disgrace’
In 1999, the New Labour government brought in a system of a means tested top-up to the basic state pension, aimed at helping people like Rosemarie who don’t get enough to live on.
Los Albertos’ band members are living for the moment
|
This can take the basic state pension up to 105 a week for a single person.
But if you have private savings, or income from a private pension, you may not qualify for this and that is Rosemarie’s problem.
She has a small nest egg of 35,000 which she has put away for a rainy day.
This means she doesn’t qualify for much of the top up - only a few pounds a week, and she regrets saving.
“I did save, but it hasn’t done me a bit of good. If I hadn’t saved I’d now have a 105 pounds a week instead of 50.22 a week.”
Difficult choice
One possible fix for the problems can be found on the other side of the world, in New Zealand, where everybody gets a flat rate state pension, based on residence, not contributions and with no means testing.
Tim Herman is not saving for his retirement
|
But even if all the problems with the state pension system are resolved, there are still a host of pitfalls in the world of private pensions.
The whole system is incredibly complicated. Martin Andrews and his girlfriend Sarah Draper are about to get married and are thinking about getting a pension together in the future, but Sarah doesn’t know where to begin.
“I can’t begin to imagine what kind of pension to choose for the future and what money I’ll need,” she said.
“The government’s not all that clear on it, so how the hell should we know?”
And when they do manage to decide, they’re faced with a whole range of obstacles to getting a good pension at the end of it.
Tough
Charges levied on pension funds by providers over a 30 year period can have a dramatic effect on the size of an individual’s savings.
Pensions expert Dr Ros Altmann has concerns about it.
The charging structure of private pensions is one of the biggest problems that we have to deal with, because you will lose a huge proportion of your capital over the longer term. You can lose up to a third of your capital over 30 years.
Dr Altmann and Mr Robinson bring shocking news
|
So to encourage us to save more into pension funds, the government spends billions of pounds a year through tax relief.
But most of this ends up subsidising the richest in the land, while offering only modest to the majority of us who need to save the most.
But the toughest thing of all for pension savers is knowing just how much to put away to get a decent pension.
“If you want 10,000 every year, you will need to save around 200,000,” said Ms Altmann.
“So if you want a 20,000 a year pension, somehow from your savings you’ve got to get an amount of about 400,000.”
Not easy for the vast majority of us. So this leaves a stark choice.
We can either rely on a low state pension in retirement, try to stretch to saving several hundred pounds a month into a personal pension or face working long into retirement to deliver an extra income.
Pensions Panic: Any Way Out? will be broadcast on BBC Two on Friday 11 March at 1900.
News - Rover suppliers receive payouts
May 21, 2008 on 11:21 am | In National Insurance | No Comments The task force set up to help suppliers of MG Rover, the car company which is in administration, has made its first payouts to suppliers.
So far, 63,000 has been paid to six companies, saving 234 workers from being laid off.
The government has said a total of 40m in grants would be made available to support businesses who supplied Rover.
There was more bad news for Rover on Thursday after its cars did badly in a league table of driver satisfaction.
Rover was ranked 28th out of 32 car in a survey of 20,000 car owners carried out by market information company JD Power and What Car? magazine.
Only Land Rover, Peugeot, Fiat and Alfa Romeo came below Rover. Top of the table were Lexus, Skoda and Honda.
Staying alive
![]()
![]()
We know of firms where 85% of their business is supplying Rover… it’s hard for them to see a future
While the task force payments may have saved jobs for the time being at the six firms, other suppliers are still warning that they may have to lay off workers.
John Edwards, a member of the task force and chief executive of Advantage West Midlands, said that helping companies which are heavily dependent on Rover for most of their work could be more difficult than helping those which are more diversified.
“We have to target those companies, which with some support, can survive,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“We know of firms where 85% of their business is supplying Rover. In these , it is hard for them to see a future for themselves.
“We are talking to government about (the possibility of) deferring VAT and National Insurance payments… but it is very difficult.”
Moving forward
According to Advantage West Midlands, some of the 40m available for grants could be used to assist residents near Longbridge who are affected by the problems there - for example, shops that serve Rover workers.
Separately, The Times newspaper reported that the government has set aside 25m to keep MG Rover afloat if Shanghai Automotive Industry (SAIC) resumes talks about investing in the car firm.
The extra government funds could keep the troubled car firm going until the election on 5 May, the newspaper said. The government has already offered a 6.5m loan to keep Rover going this week.
The DTI said that talk of a further 25m was “pure speculation.” But it added that it would be meeting later this week to consider future funding .
PricewaterhouseCoopers, the administrator for MG Rover, is said to want to put forward a new plan to SAIC, but doubts remain over how enthusiastic the Chinese firm will be to revive the deal.
News - Rover suppliers start to cut jobs
May 20, 2008 on 3:17 am | In National Insurance | No Comments| A major supplier to MG Rover, parts and panel maker Stadco, is to cut 280 jobs at two of its plants.
|
News - Lib Dems ‘are real alternative’
May 19, 2008 on 2:13 am | In National Insurance | No Comments
The Lib Dems say replacing council tax with a new local income tax will make 15 million households better off.
Mr Kennedy, returning after the birth of his son, also wants UK troops to leave Iraq by the end of the year.
The Tories said a vote for the Lib Dems would mean higher taxes, while Labour said the Lib Dems’ sums didn’t add up.
|
The Liberal Democrats have been the real opposition Charles Kennedy
Lib Dem launch |
Taking charge again on Thursday, two days after his wife Sarah gave birth to their son Donald, Mr Kennedy said the manifesto was “based on fairness, based on opportunity”.
‘Dignity’
He described the document as a “fully-costed and affordable programme to create a fair Britain”.
It offered “dignity for older people, real opportunity for our children and a fair deal for families”, he said.
The 20-page manifesto includes plans for a new 50% top tax rate on earnings over 100,000 to pay for its .
|
LIBERAL DEMOCRAT MANIFESTO
Read the Liberal Democrat manifesto in full (241KB)
Most computers will open PDF documents automatically, but you may need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Download the reader here
|
The party say the typical family will be 450 better off under the local income tax, with half of households paying less, 25% paying more and 25% paying the same.
They claim six million pensioners would pay no local tax at all under the plans. Most households with incomes of about 38,000 and above will probably be worse off.
But at the launch Mr Kennedy appeared confused about how much the tax would raise and who would end up paying more.
Lib Dem chairman Matthew Taylor admitted his leader had struggled to remember a figure but put it down to the new father’s lack of sleep.
Free dental checks
The party also promises 21,000 extra teachers and an extra 100 a month pension for the over 75s.
There would also be a new “citizen’s pension” so women would have an automatic right to a full state pension based on residence, not National Insurance contributions.
|
KEY LIB DEM PLEDGES
50% top rate tax on earnings over 100,000
Replace council tax with local income tax
Scrap university fees
21,000 extra teachers
100 a month pension extra for over 75s
Free eye and dental checks
10,000 extra police
20,000 community support officers
Lower class sizes
Free personal care
Scrap the Child Trust Fund
Scrap the Child Support Agency
Lib Dem fact check
|
Mr Kennedy reminded voters of Lib Dem opposition to the Iraq war. He called for a phased withdrawal of British forces by the end of this year, when the UN legal mandate expires.
He also promised an extra 10,000 police and 20,000 community support officers.
But co-chairman Liam Fox said: “If you vote for the Liberal Democrats, the message you’ll be sending Mr Blair is simple - ‘Carry on, please, you’re doing just fine’.
“A vote for the Liberal Democrats is a vote for higher taxes, unlimited immigration and the abolition of mandatory sentences for murder or a second serious sexual or violent crime.”
Mr Blair, who made a speech claiming that Labour are now the party of wealth creation, attacked Lib Dem plans to have a 50% top rate of tax as “economically wrong”.
He called the proposal “wildly unrealistic” and would, “if implemented, damage the economy”.
|
HAVE YOUR SAY
The Lib Dems’ manifesto contains much with which I fully agree Steve Stacey, Spalding, England
Send your views
Kilroy manifesto tax pledge
|
Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Tory leader Michael Howard pledged to ensure children of immigrants were taught to master English.
He also highlighted plans to abolish university tuition fees by charging a commercial rate of interest on student loans.
Former chat show host Robert Kilroy-Silk’s Veritas party launched its manifesto with a pledge to introduce a flat rate of income tax.
News - Paxman grills party leaders
May 17, 2008 on 5:32 pm | In National Insurance | No Comments| The proposals have been in for months, the going on for weeks, and finally this week Jeremy Paxman will sit down with each of the party leaders for what we hope will be three of the landmarks of the campaign.
The Paxman Interviews do exactly what the title says. There are no audiences, no phone-ins, no sofa, no young Ant and Dec. Just Jeremy Paxman doing what he does best with each of the party leaders in turn, in three specials. The half-hour will run at 1930 BST on BBC One, with another chance to see the best bits on Newsnight in its normal slot on BBC Two at 2230 BST. Searching questions First up on Monday, 18 April is the Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy. With a new baby less than a week old and a manifesto launch he would rather forget, Mr Kennedy needs a sure-footed outing to get his campaign back on track. The Prime Minister Tony Blair follows on Wednesday, 20 April. In the corresponding fixture ahead of the last general election the prime minister famously told Paxman that voters should not assume that National Insurance contributions would go up if Labour won. They did, and we expect Paxman will want to know why. Last, but possibly most of all, will be the interview with the Conservative leader Michael Howard on Friday, 22 April. Jeremy Paxman’s 1997 encounter with Mr Howard, then a candidate in the Tory leadership contest, was easily voted the viewers’ favourite moment in 25 years of Newsnight earlier this year. We do not need to explain why. What will happen this time? The Paxman Interviews will be broadcast on Monday 18, Wednesday 20 and Friday 22 April 2005 at 1930 BST on BBC One. You can also watch the interviews live and on demand from the BBC News Website.
|
News - Blair defends his record
May 16, 2008 on 2:18 pm | In National Insurance | No Comments| As prime minister he had the awesome responsibility of having to take decisions on issues such as whether to go to war on Iraq. He took that decision in all integrity, he suggested.
It was the right decision to have taken and he was unapologetic for it, yet he did not disrespect those who believed they had been misled, he said. It is an answer he has rehearsed time and again and is not about to re-write in the second half of the general election campaign. Similarly, he was not about to confess to having misled voters about his on taxation at the last election. Extra spending Four years ago, in a similar interview, he had rejected Mr Paxman’s suggestion that it was clear from all he had said that he would raise National Insurance if he was re-elected. There is another well-rehearsed answer to this one - he was only led to increase NICs after a post-election report indicated such levels of extra spending were necessary for the health service.
So couldn’t he do the same again, if he wins a third time, when, for example, the Turner report into the pensions black hole is delivered. He was not about to be drawn into mapping out budgets at this point, he declared. And there was more but, it has to be said, despite some persistent probing, there was nothing particularly in the answers. And the prime minister may well feel he emerged with few bruises from the encounter with one of the toughest boys on the block.
|
News - Blair defiant over Iraq decision
May 15, 2008 on 1:27 pm | In National Insurance | No Comments| Tony Blair has defended his decision to go to war in Iraq as a tough choice but one that was “the right thing to do”.
He rejected the Tory proposal to set an upper limit on economic migrants as having the potential to cause ” damage” to the economy by denying businesses the workers they needed.
|
Powered by 120host.net free blog community design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
Lib Dem launch